Guide

Which Model to Use for OpenClaw

OpenClaw work is different from plain chat. You need a model that can plan, choose tools, and stay consistent across a longer task. Raw token speed matters, but agent quality is what makes the workflow useful.

Section 1

What OpenClaw needs from a model

For OpenClaw, the model must keep the plan coherent, pick the right tool at the right time, and recover gracefully when a step fails. That means the best choice is often the model that scores well on the benchmark methodology rather than the fastest model in isolation.

  • Planning: can the model break a problem into usable steps?
  • Tool use: does it choose the right operation instead of guessing?
  • Stability: does it keep context and avoid drifting off task?

Section 2

Recommended selection strategy

Start with a model that has strong quality scores, then validate that it still runs well enough on your hardware to keep the loop responsive. For OpenClaw, a slightly slower but more dependable model often wins because fewer bad tool calls means fewer wasted iterations.

  • Choose the strongest agent-capable model that fits your VRAM budget.
  • Favor consistent quality over benchmark spikes that do not repeat.
  • Test with the benchmark data and your own OpenClaw workflow.

Section 3

What to avoid

Do not pick purely on speed if the model regularly misses steps or produces weak plans. For OpenClaw, bad reasoning costs more than a few seconds of latency because every mistake compounds across the workflow.

  • Avoid models that fit only by pushing VRAM to the limit.
  • Avoid low-quality runs that rely on lucky one-off outputs.
  • Avoid choosing a model before checking its benchmark evidence.