Model benchmarks
Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 local LLM performance
As of October 2026, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 runs at up to 44.7 tok/s for local inference (best of 5 community benchmark runs across 2 GPUs).
Model size
35B
Peak speed
44.7 tok/s
Average speed
24.4 tok/s
Avg PP
253.9 tok/s
Min memory
n/a
Max context
200,000 tokens
Avg output / run
26,588 tokens
Avg runtime / run
22m 36s
Avg quality
81.5
Benchmark runs
5
GPUs tested
2
Quality by task
Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 5 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.
| Task | P5 (low) | Avg | P95 (high) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 76.2 | 81.5 | 84.0 |
| Agent Workflow | 82.4 | 84.4 | 88.3 |
| Code Generation | 74.9 | 82.0 | 85.6 |
| Role Play & Narrative | 53.7 | 76.0 | 85.2 |
| Research & Analysis | 82.0 | 83.5 | 85.1 |
Performance by hardware and tool
Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.
| Hardware | Tool | Quant | Best tok/s | Avg tok/s | Memory | Context | Quality | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX | lm-studio | — | 44.7 tok/s | 44.7 tok/s | 21.6 GB | 80,000 tokens | 82.8 | 1 |
| Intel Graphics | llama.cpp | — | 21.9 tok/s | 19.1 tok/s | n/a | 200,000 tokens | 80.7 | 3 |
| Intel Graphics | llama.cpp:vulkan | — | 20.3 tok/s | 20.3 tok/s | n/a | 200,000 tokens | 82.6 | 1 |
Benchmark runs
All 5 Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 good for coding?
- In our benchmarks, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 scores 82.0/100 for coding. It runs at about 24.4 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-IQ3_XXS is faster (~80.3 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (84.5/100).
- Is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
- In our benchmarks, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 scores 84.4/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 24.4 tok/s, so if you want more speed, muse-glimmer:latest is faster (~33.3 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.6/100).
- How fast is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 for local inference?
- Across 5 community benchmark runs, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 reaches up to 44.7 tok/s and averages 24.4 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX.
- How much memory does Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1 need?
- The leanest observed configuration used about n/a of memory.
- Which tools have been used to run Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1?
- Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp, llama.cpp:vulkan, lm-studio. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.