Is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?

In our benchmarks, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus scores 81.6/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 113.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-MLX-4bit is faster (~137.0 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (81.2/100).

How fast is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus for local inference?

Across 6 community benchmark runs, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus reaches up to 119.9 tok/s and averages 113.1 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX.

How much memory does Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus need?

The leanest observed configuration used about 17.5 GB of memory.

Which tools have been used to run Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus?

Benchmarks were submitted using lm-studio. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.

Model benchmarks

Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus local LLM performance

As of October 2026, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus runs at up to 119.9 tok/s for local inference (best of 6 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

lm-studio

ShareReddit X

Model size

35B

Peak speed

119.9 tok/s

Average speed

113.1 tok/s

Avg PP

1217.2 tok/s

Min memory

17.5 GB

Max context

80,000 tokens

Avg output / run

20,501 tokens

Avg runtime / run

2m 56s

Avg quality

81.3

Benchmark runs

GPUs tested

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 6 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

Task	P5 (low)	Avg	P95 (high)
Overall	78.8	81.3	85.2
Agent Workflow	77.1	81.6	86.8
Code Generation	70.9	78.9	85.8
Role Play & Narrative	76.9	82.3	90.2
Research & Analysis	76.6	82.4	85.9

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

Hardware	Tool	Quant	Best tok/s	Avg tok/s	Memory	Context	Quality	Runs
AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX	lm-studio	—	119.9 tok/s	113.1 tok/s	17.5 GB	80,000 tokens	81.3	6

Benchmark runs

All 6 Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Open run page →

Frequently asked questions

Is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?: In our benchmarks, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus scores 81.6/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 113.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-MLX-4bit is faster (~137.0 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (81.2/100).
How fast is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus for local inference?: Across 6 community benchmark runs, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus reaches up to 119.9 tok/s and averages 113.1 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX.
How much memory does Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus need?: The leanest observed configuration used about 17.5 GB of memory.
Which tools have been used to run Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus?: Benchmarks were submitted using lm-studio. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.