Is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL good for coding?

In our benchmarks, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL scores 80.1/100 for coding. It runs at about 49.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, local-qwen is faster (~60.2 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (84.8/100).

Is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?

In our benchmarks, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL scores 86.9/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 49.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).

How fast is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL for local inference?

Across 8 community benchmark runs, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL reaches up to 54.8 tok/s and averages 49.1 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon 8050S.

Which tools have been used to run Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL?

Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.

Model benchmarks

Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL local LLM performance

As of October 2026, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL runs at up to 54.8 tok/s for local inference (best of 8 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cppQ5_K

ShareReddit X

Model size

35B

Peak speed

54.8 tok/s

Average speed

49.1 tok/s

Avg PP

1230.4 tok/s

Min memory

n/a

Max context

100,000 tokens

Avg output / run

28,872 tokens

Avg runtime / run

10m 2s

Avg quality

84.9

Benchmark runs

GPUs tested

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 8 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

Task	P5 (low)	Avg	P95 (high)
Overall	82.6	84.9	87.5
Agent Workflow	81.6	86.9	91.1
Code Generation	75.7	80.1	83.8
Role Play & Narrative	78.8	86.5	92.2
Research & Analysis	82.4	86.4	89.4

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

Hardware	Tool	Quant	Best tok/s	Avg tok/s	Memory	Context	Quality	Runs
AMD Radeon 8050S	llama.cpp	Q5_K	54.8 tok/s	49.1 tok/s	n/a	100,000 tokens	84.9	8

Benchmark runs

All 8 Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Open run page →

Frequently asked questions

Is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL good for coding?: In our benchmarks, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL scores 80.1/100 for coding. It runs at about 49.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, local-qwen is faster (~60.2 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (84.8/100).
Is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?: In our benchmarks, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL scores 86.9/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 49.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
How fast is Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL for local inference?: Across 8 community benchmark runs, Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL reaches up to 54.8 tok/s and averages 49.1 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon 8050S.
Which tools have been used to run Cyber-Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MTP-UD-Q5_K_XL?: Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.