Model benchmarks
unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF local LLM performance
As of October 2026, unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF runs at up to 82.0 tok/s for local inference (best of 7 community benchmark runs across 2 GPUs).
Model size
12B
Peak speed
82.0 tok/s
Average speed
61.2 tok/s
Avg PP
950.1 tok/s
Min memory
10.3 GB
Max context
100,000 tokens
Avg output / run
11,533 tokens
Avg runtime / run
3m 30s
Avg quality
70.4
Benchmark runs
7
GPUs tested
2
Quality by task
Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 7 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.
| Task | P5 (low) | Avg | P95 (high) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 67.9 | 70.4 | 73.3 |
| Agent Workflow | 59.2 | 68.8 | 77.1 |
| Code Generation | 47.6 | 60.3 | 71.5 |
| Role Play & Narrative | 79.9 | 81.9 | 84.8 |
| Research & Analysis | 66.1 | 70.8 | 75.6 |
Performance by hardware and tool
Every hardware/tool/quantization combination unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.
| Hardware | Tool | Quant | Best tok/s | Avg tok/s | Memory | Context | Quality | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | Unsloth Studio | UD-Q4_K_XL | 82.0 tok/s | 64.9 tok/s | 10.3 GB | 100,000 tokens | 71.9 | 4 |
| AMD Radeon RX 7900 GRE | Unsloth Studio | UD-Q4_K_XL | 67.2 tok/s | 67.2 tok/s | 11.5 GB | 65,536 tokens | 68.1 | 1 |
| NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 | llama.cpp | — | 51.4 tok/s | 50.7 tok/s | n/a | 32,768 tokens | 68.7 | 2 |
Benchmark runs
All 7 unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.
Frequently asked questions
- Is unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF good for coding?
- In our benchmarks, unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF scores 60.3/100 for coding. It runs at about 61.2 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus is faster (~110.5 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (81.1/100).
- Is unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
- In our benchmarks, unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF scores 68.8/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 61.2 tok/s, so if you want more speed, swift-iq2_xs is faster (~91.5 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.4/100).
- How fast is unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF for local inference?
- Across 7 community benchmark runs, unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF reaches up to 82.0 tok/s and averages 61.2 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070.
- How much memory does unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF need?
- The leanest observed configuration used about 10.3 GB of memory (quantizations tested: UD-Q4_K_XL).
- Which tools have been used to run unsloth/gemma-4-12B-it-qat-GGUF?
- Benchmarks were submitted using Unsloth Studio, llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.