Model benchmarks

unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL local LLM performance

As of October 2026, unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL runs at up to 64.7 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cppQ5_K
ShareRedditX

Model size

26B

Peak speed

64.7 tok/s

Average speed

64.5 tok/s

Avg PP

685.5 tok/s

Min memory

n/a

Max context

65,536 tokens

Avg output / run

14,973 tokens

Avg runtime / run

4m 15s

Avg quality

65.5

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall63.865.567.3
Agent Workflow69.574.579.5
Code Generation63.365.467.4
Role Play & Narrative67.972.476.8
Research & Analysis40.249.859.4

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Device 7551llama.cppQ5_K64.7 tok/s64.5 tok/sn/a65,536 tokens65.52

Benchmark runs

All 2 unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL good for coding?
In our benchmarks, unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL scores 65.4/100 for coding. It runs at about 64.5 tok/s, so if you want more speed, ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF is faster (~90.8 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (83.8/100).
Is unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL scores 74.5/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 64.5 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-APEX-Mini is faster (~88.2 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.3/100).
How fast is unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL reaches up to 64.7 tok/s and averages 64.5 tok/s, with the fastest results on Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Device 7551.
Which tools have been used to run unsloth/gemma-4-26B-A4B-it-GGUF:UD-Q5_K_XL?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.