Model benchmarks

gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M local LLM performance

As of November 2026, gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M runs at up to 83.8 tok/s for local inference (best of 5 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cppQ4_K_M
ShareRedditX

Model size

4B

Peak speed

83.8 tok/s

Average speed

81.1 tok/s

Avg PP

1536.5 tok/s

Min memory

5.2 GB

Max context

16,384 tokens

Avg output / run

8,682 tokens

Avg runtime / run

1m 51s

Avg quality

70.9

Benchmark runs

5

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 5 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall66.870.976.1
Agent Workflow70.080.490.1
Code Generation55.961.768.0
Role Play & Narrative71.778.486.0
Research & Analysis58.063.368.1

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated November 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060llama.cppQ4_K_M83.8 tok/s81.1 tok/s5.2 GB16,384 tokens70.95

Benchmark runs

All 5 gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M good for coding?
In our benchmarks, gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M scores 61.7/100 for coding. It runs at about 81.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B.APEX-I-NanoPlus is faster (~110.5 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (81.1/100).
Is gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M scores 80.4/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 81.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, qwen3.8-flash-next-iq3_s is faster (~98.1 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (90.6/100).
How fast is gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M for local inference?
Across 5 community benchmark runs, gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M reaches up to 83.8 tok/s and averages 81.1 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060.
How much memory does gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 5.2 GB of memory (quantizations tested: Q4_K_M).
Which tools have been used to run gemma-4-E4B-it-M-TS-Q4_K_M?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.