Model benchmarks

mistral-small:Q5 local LLM performance

As of October 2026, mistral-small:Q5 runs at up to 39.3 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 0 GPUs).

llama.cpp
ShareRedditX

Model size

Unknown

Peak speed

39.3 tok/s

Average speed

39.3 tok/s

Avg PP

1787.5 tok/s

Min memory

n/a

Max context

65,536 tokens

Avg output / run

4,894 tokens

Avg runtime / run

2m 10s

Avg quality

68.9

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

0

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall66.168.971.7
Agent Workflow76.782.488.2
Code Generation55.457.359.2
Role Play & Narrative56.268.681.0
Research & Analysis62.167.372.4

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination mistral-small:Q5 has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
AMD Radeon Graphicsllama.cpp—39.3 tok/s39.3 tok/sn/a65,536 tokens68.92

Benchmark runs

All 2 mistral-small:Q5 runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is mistral-small:Q5 good for coding?
In our benchmarks, mistral-small:Q5 scores 57.3/100 for coding. It runs at about 39.3 tok/s, so if you want more speed, local-qwen is faster (~60.2 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (84.8/100).
Is mistral-small:Q5 good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, mistral-small:Q5 scores 82.4/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 39.3 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
How fast is mistral-small:Q5 for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, mistral-small:Q5 reaches up to 39.3 tok/s and averages 39.3 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon Graphics.
Which tools have been used to run mistral-small:Q5?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.