Model benchmarks

Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 local LLM performance

As of November 2026, Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 runs at up to 40.6 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cpp
ShareRedditX

Model size

30B

Peak speed

40.6 tok/s

Average speed

40.6 tok/s

Avg PP

721.9 tok/s

Min memory

53.8 GB

Max context

32,768 tokens

Avg output / run

13,771 tokens

Avg runtime / run

5m 43s

Avg quality

84.5

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall84.384.584.8
Agent Workflow89.289.990.7
Code Generation73.674.976.2
Role Play & Narrative87.589.591.4
Research & Analysis82.983.984.8

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated November 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
Tesla V100-PCIE-32GBllama.cpp—40.6 tok/s40.6 tok/s53.8 GB32,768 tokens84.52

Benchmark runs

All 2 Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 good for coding?
In our benchmarks, Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 scores 74.9/100 for coding. It runs at about 40.6 tok/s, so if you want more speed, local-qwen is faster (~60.2 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (84.8/100).
Is Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 scores 89.9/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 40.6 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
How fast is Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 reaches up to 40.6 tok/s and averages 40.6 tok/s, with the fastest results on Tesla V100-PCIE-32GB.
How much memory does Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05 need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 53.8 GB of memory.
Which tools have been used to run Muse-Glimmer-30B_t1p95k64m05?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.