Is nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b good for coding?

In our benchmarks, nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b scores 72.1/100 for coding. It runs at about 73.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:IQ3_S is faster (~104.3 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (83.0/100).

Is nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?

In our benchmarks, nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b scores 78.7/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 73.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, swift-iq2_xs is faster (~91.5 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.4/100).

How fast is nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b for local inference?

Across 5 community benchmark runs, nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b reaches up to 161.3 tok/s and averages 73.1 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT.

Which tools have been used to run nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b?

Benchmarks were submitted using LM Studio. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.

Model benchmarks

nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b local LLM performance

As of September 2026, nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b runs at up to 161.3 tok/s for local inference (best of 5 community benchmark runs across 2 GPUs).

LM Studio

ShareReddit X

Model size

35B

Peak speed

161.3 tok/s

Average speed

73.1 tok/s

Avg PP

1464.9 tok/s

Min memory

n/a

Max context

131,072 tokens

Avg output / run

22,459 tokens

Avg runtime / run

6m 23s

Avg quality

77.2

Benchmark runs

GPUs tested

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 5 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

Task	P5 (low)	Avg	P95 (high)
Overall	74.9	77.2	78.9
Agent Workflow	75.2	78.7	82.1
Code Generation	69.6	72.1	74.0
Role Play & Narrative	73.0	82.8	90.6
Research & Analysis	70.9	75.2	78.9

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated September 2026.

Hardware	Tool	Quant	Best tok/s	Avg tok/s	Memory	Context	Quality	Runs
AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT	LM Studio	—	161.3 tok/s	161.3 tok/s	n/a	131,072 tokens	76.6	1
AMD Radeon RX 9050 / 9060 XT	LM Studio	—	52.1 tok/s	51.0 tok/s	n/a	131,072 tokens	77.4	4

Benchmark runs

All 5 nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Open run page →

Frequently asked questions

Is nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b good for coding?: In our benchmarks, nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b scores 72.1/100 for coding. It runs at about 73.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:IQ3_S is faster (~104.3 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (83.0/100).
Is nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?: In our benchmarks, nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b scores 78.7/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 73.1 tok/s, so if you want more speed, swift-iq2_xs is faster (~91.5 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.4/100).
How fast is nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b for local inference?: Across 5 community benchmark runs, nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b reaches up to 161.3 tok/s and averages 73.1 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon RX 9060 XT.
Which tools have been used to run nail-qwen3.6-35b-a3b?: Benchmarks were submitted using LM Studio. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.