Model benchmarks

Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 local LLM performance

As of November 2026, Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 runs at up to 125.8 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cpp
ShareRedditX

Model size

30B

Peak speed

125.8 tok/s

Average speed

125.7 tok/s

Avg PP

1133.0 tok/s

Min memory

44.7 GB

Max context

32,768 tokens

Avg output / run

28,813 tokens

Avg runtime / run

3m 54s

Avg quality

75.6

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall75.575.675.6
Agent Workflow85.988.490.8
Code Generation60.764.468.0
Role Play & Narrative72.276.079.7
Research & Analysis70.973.676.3

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated November 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
Tesla V100-PCIE-32GBllama.cpp—125.8 tok/s125.7 tok/s44.7 GB32,768 tokens75.62

Benchmark runs

All 2 Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 good for coding?
In our benchmarks, Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 scores 64.4/100 for coding. It runs at about 125.7 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Q4_K_XL is faster (~156.9 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (82.2/100).
Is Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 scores 88.4/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 125.7 tok/s, so if you want more speed, swift-1.5-qwen3.8-flash-next-iq3_s is faster (~259.0 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (88.9/100).
How fast is Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 reaches up to 125.8 tok/s and averages 125.7 tok/s, with the fastest results on Tesla V100-PCIE-32GB.
How much memory does Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05 need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 44.7 GB of memory.
Which tools have been used to run Nemotron-3.5-Lightning_t1p95k40m05?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.