Model benchmarks

nemotron-bolt:THINKING local LLM performance

As of October 2026, nemotron-bolt:THINKING runs at up to 135.8 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 0 GPUs).

llama.cpp
ShareRedditX

Model size

Unknown

Peak speed

135.8 tok/s

Average speed

133.0 tok/s

Avg PP

1602.7 tok/s

Min memory

n/a

Max context

131,072 tokens

Avg output / run

7,817 tokens

Avg runtime / run

1m 5s

Avg quality

67.6

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

0

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall66.167.669.0
Agent Workflow75.375.776.1
Code Generation63.164.064.9
Role Play & Narrative72.973.373.7
Research & Analysis50.757.363.8

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination nemotron-bolt:THINKING has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
AMD Radeon Graphicsllama.cpp—135.8 tok/s133.0 tok/sn/a131,072 tokens67.62

Benchmark runs

All 2 nemotron-bolt:THINKING runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is nemotron-bolt:THINKING good for coding?
In our benchmarks, nemotron-bolt:THINKING scores 64.0/100 for coding. It runs at about 133.0 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-Q4_K_XL is faster (~156.9 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (82.2/100).
Is nemotron-bolt:THINKING good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, nemotron-bolt:THINKING scores 75.7/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 133.0 tok/s, so if you want more speed, swift-1.5-qwen3.8-flash-next-iq3_s is faster (~259.0 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (88.9/100).
How fast is nemotron-bolt:THINKING for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, nemotron-bolt:THINKING reaches up to 135.8 tok/s and averages 133.0 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon Graphics.
Which tools have been used to run nemotron-bolt:THINKING?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.