Model benchmarks

protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M local LLM performance

As of October 2026, protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M runs at up to 92.7 tok/s for local inference (best of 5 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cppQ5_K_M
ShareRedditX

Model size

9B

Peak speed

92.7 tok/s

Average speed

78.9 tok/s

Avg PP

892.0 tok/s

Min memory

7.9 GB

Max context

32,768 tokens

Avg output / run

29,760 tokens

Avg runtime / run

6m 15s

Avg quality

74.5

Benchmark runs

5

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 5 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall65.474.578.9
Agent Workflow65.476.482.6
Code Generation15.153.876.4
Role Play & Narrative67.582.590.5
Research & Analysis82.785.587.9

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
AMD Radeon RX 9070/9070 XT/9070 GREllama.cppQ5_K_M92.7 tok/s78.9 tok/s7.9 GB32,768 tokens74.55

Benchmark runs

All 5 protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M good for coding?
In our benchmarks, protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M scores 53.8/100 for coding. It runs at about 78.9 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-IQ3_XXS is faster (~91.4 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (81.6/100).
Is protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M scores 76.4/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 78.9 tok/s, so if you want more speed, qwen3.8-flash-next-iq3_s is faster (~116.8 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (88.4/100).
How fast is protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M for local inference?
Across 5 community benchmark runs, protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M reaches up to 92.7 tok/s and averages 78.9 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon RX 9070/9070 XT/9070 GRE.
How much memory does protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 7.9 GB of memory (quantizations tested: Q5_K_M).
Which tools have been used to run protoLabsAI/Ornith-1.5-9B-MTP-GGUF:Q5_K_M?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.