Model benchmarks
Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF local LLM performance
As of October 2026, Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF runs at up to 10.2 tok/s for local inference (best of 3 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).
Model size
7B
Peak speed
10.2 tok/s
Average speed
9.2 tok/s
Avg PP
541.4 tok/s
Min memory
n/a
Max context
65,535 tokens
Avg output / run
4,257 tokens
Avg runtime / run
8m 15s
Avg quality
32.0
Benchmark runs
3
GPUs tested
1
Quality by task
Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 3 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.
| Task | P5 (low) | Avg | P95 (high) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 25.5 | 32.0 | 40.4 |
| Agent Workflow | 13.2 | 33.2 | 58.0 |
| Code Generation | 18.6 | 25.5 | 30.6 |
| Role Play & Narrative | 27.0 | 31.2 | 37.0 |
| Research & Analysis | 24.8 | 38.1 | 46.4 |
Performance by hardware and tool
Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.
| Hardware | Tool | Quant | Best tok/s | Avg tok/s | Memory | Context | Quality | Runs |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Intel Arc B390 | llama.cpp | — | 10.2 tok/s | 9.2 tok/s | n/a | 65,535 tokens | 32.0 | 3 |
Benchmark runs
All 3 Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.
Frequently asked questions
- Is Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF good for coding?
- In our benchmarks, Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF scores 25.5/100 for coding. It runs at about 9.2 tok/s, so if you want more speed, IsValorum/Nex-N2.5-mini-APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1-GGUF:1 is faster (~25.7 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (85.0/100).
- Is Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
- In our benchmarks, Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF scores 33.2/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 9.2 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
- How fast is Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF for local inference?
- Across 3 community benchmark runs, Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF reaches up to 10.2 tok/s and averages 9.2 tok/s, with the fastest results on Intel Arc B390.
- Which tools have been used to run Qwen/Qwen2.5-Coder-7B-Instruct-GGUF?
- Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.