Model benchmarks

richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF local LLM performance

As of October 2026, richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF runs at up to 8.1 tok/s for local inference (best of 3 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cpp
ShareRedditX

Model size

14B

Peak speed

8.1 tok/s

Average speed

8.0 tok/s

Avg PP

214.7 tok/s

Min memory

n/a

Max context

65,535 tokens

Avg output / run

12,210 tokens

Avg runtime / run

29m 28s

Avg quality

52.1

Benchmark runs

3

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 3 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall49.552.155.1
Agent Workflow34.140.146.0
Code Generation27.938.749.0
Role Play & Narrative59.370.479.6
Research & Analysis43.759.071.7

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
Intel Arc B390llama.cpp—8.1 tok/s8.0 tok/sn/a65,535 tokens52.13

Benchmark runs

All 3 richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF good for coding?
In our benchmarks, richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF scores 38.7/100 for coding. It runs at about 8.0 tok/s, so if you want more speed, IsValorum/Nex-N2.5-mini-APEX-I-MiniPlus-V2.1-GGUF:1 is faster (~25.7 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (85.0/100).
Is richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF scores 40.1/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 8.0 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
How fast is richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF for local inference?
Across 3 community benchmark runs, richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF reaches up to 8.1 tok/s and averages 8.0 tok/s, with the fastest results on Intel Arc B390.
Which tools have been used to run richardyoung/Qwen3-14B-abliterated-GGUF?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.