Model benchmarks

unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF local LLM performance

As of October 2026, unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF runs at up to 13.8 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

Unsloth Studiollama.cppUD-Q4_K_XL
ShareRedditX

Model size

9B

Peak speed

13.8 tok/s

Average speed

13.5 tok/s

Avg PP

204.3 tok/s

Min memory

17.2 GB

Max context

65,536 tokens

Avg output / run

12,039 tokens

Avg runtime / run

15m 19s

Avg quality

69.6

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall67.669.671.5
Agent Workflow65.470.074.6
Code Generation48.753.558.3
Role Play & Narrative70.473.877.2
Research & Analysis79.081.082.9

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140V GPU (16GB)Unsloth StudioUD-Q4_K_XL13.8 tok/s13.8 tok/s17.2 GB65,536 tokens71.81
Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140V GPU (16GB)llama.cpp—13.3 tok/s13.3 tok/sn/a16,384 tokens67.41

Benchmark runs

All 2 unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF good for coding?
In our benchmarks, unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF scores 53.5/100 for coding. It runs at about 13.5 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Qwen3.8-27B-oQ4e-fp16-mtp is faster (~38.6 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (82.6/100).
Is unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF scores 70.0/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 13.5 tok/s, so if you want more speed, muse-glimmer:latest is faster (~33.3 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.6/100).
How fast is unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF reaches up to 13.8 tok/s and averages 13.5 tok/s, with the fastest results on Intel(R) Arc(TM) 140V GPU (16GB).
How much memory does unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 17.2 GB of memory (quantizations tested: UD-Q4_K_XL).
Which tools have been used to run unsloth/Qwen3.5-9B-GGUF?
Benchmarks were submitted using Unsloth Studio, llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.