Model benchmarks

Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K local LLM performance

As of November 2026, Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K runs at up to 43.7 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cppQ6_K
ShareRedditX

Model size

27B

Peak speed

43.7 tok/s

Average speed

34.2 tok/s

Avg PP

471.2 tok/s

Min memory

39.8 GB

Max context

262,144 tokens

Avg output / run

51,664 tokens

Avg runtime / run

24m 46s

Avg quality

85.7

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall83.385.788.1
Agent Workflow81.986.991.8
Code Generation85.685.986.2
Role Play & Narrative90.791.692.6
Research & Analysis73.278.483.6

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated November 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
NVIDIA RTX A6000llama.cppQ6_K43.7 tok/s34.2 tok/s39.8 GB262,144 tokens85.72

Benchmark runs

All 2 Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K good for coding?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K scores 85.9/100 for coding. It runs at about 34.2 tok/s, so if you want more speed, local-qwen is faster (~60.2 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (84.8/100).
Is Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K scores 86.9/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 34.2 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
How fast is Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K reaches up to 43.7 tok/s and averages 34.2 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA RTX A6000.
How much memory does Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 39.8 GB of memory (quantizations tested: Q6_K).
Which tools have been used to run Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.