Model benchmarks

Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 local LLM performance

As of November 2026, Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 runs at up to 26.9 tok/s for local inference (best of 3 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cpp
ShareRedditX

Model size

27B

Peak speed

26.9 tok/s

Average speed

26.5 tok/s

Avg PP

460.5 tok/s

Min memory

38.2 GB

Max context

262,144 tokens

Avg output / run

64,049 tokens

Avg runtime / run

40m 43s

Avg quality

86.5

Benchmark runs

3

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 3 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall84.186.588.6
Agent Workflow84.785.887.3
Code Generation76.082.787.9
Role Play & Narrative87.392.295.4
Research & Analysis83.485.487.9

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated November 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
NVIDIA RTX A6000llama.cpp—26.9 tok/s26.5 tok/s38.2 GB262,144 tokens86.53

Benchmark runs

All 3 Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 good for coding?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 scores 82.7/100 for coding. It runs at about 26.5 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Qwen3.8-27B-Cold-Fusion-GAIN-V1.1-NM-DAU-NEO-MAX-MTP-GGUF-Q6_K is faster (~34.2 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (85.9/100).
Is Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 scores 85.8/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 26.5 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
How fast is Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 for local inference?
Across 3 community benchmark runs, Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 reaches up to 26.9 tok/s and averages 26.5 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA RTX A6000.
How much memory does Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2 need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 38.2 GB of memory.
Which tools have been used to run Qwen3.8-27B-EfficientThink-Uncensored-K3-Opus5-Grok4.6-GPT5.6Sol-SFT-SimPO-DFlash2?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.