Model benchmarks

Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered local LLM performance

As of October 2026, Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered runs at up to 40.7 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cpp
ShareRedditX

Model size

27B

Peak speed

40.7 tok/s

Average speed

37.4 tok/s

Avg PP

309.4 tok/s

Min memory

16.3 GB

Max context

65,536 tokens

Avg output / run

74,914 tokens

Avg runtime / run

33m 20s

Avg quality

86.4

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall86.286.486.7
Agent Workflow82.483.384.1
Code Generation81.181.682.1
Role Play & Narrative90.491.893.1
Research & Analysis88.589.289.9

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XTllama.cpp—40.7 tok/s37.4 tok/s16.3 GB65,536 tokens86.42

Benchmark runs

All 2 Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered good for coding?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered scores 81.6/100 for coding. It runs at about 37.4 tok/s, so if you want more speed, K2-Horizon-MoVA-36B-A4B-MLX-4bit is faster (~48.5 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (82.5/100).
Is Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered scores 83.3/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 37.4 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-APEX-Mini is faster (~88.2 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.3/100).
How fast is Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered reaches up to 40.7 tok/s and averages 37.4 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT.
How much memory does Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 16.3 GB of memory.
Which tools have been used to run Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-recovered?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.