Model benchmarks

Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp local LLM performance

As of October 2026, Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp runs at up to 27.4 tok/s for local inference (best of 3 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cppQ6_K
ShareRedditX

Model size

27B

Peak speed

27.4 tok/s

Average speed

27.3 tok/s

Avg PP

614.8 tok/s

Min memory

33.2 GB

Max context

262,144 tokens

Avg output / run

28,920 tokens

Avg runtime / run

17m 59s

Avg quality

84.5

Benchmark runs

3

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 3 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall81.984.586.7
Agent Workflow77.884.190.7
Code Generation75.979.785.5
Role Play & Narrative84.888.591.3
Research & Analysis82.685.788.3

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
NVIDIA RTX A6000llama.cppQ6_K27.4 tok/s27.3 tok/s33.2 GB262,144 tokens84.53

Benchmark runs

All 3 Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp good for coding?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp scores 79.7/100 for coding. It runs at about 27.3 tok/s, so if you want more speed, local-qwen is faster (~60.2 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (84.8/100).
Is Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp scores 84.1/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 27.3 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
How fast is Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp for local inference?
Across 3 community benchmark runs, Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp reaches up to 27.4 tok/s and averages 27.3 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA RTX A6000.
How much memory does Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 33.2 GB of memory (quantizations tested: Q6_K).
Which tools have been used to run Qwen3.8-27B-Heretic-Abliterated-Uncensored-GGUF-RVN-Q6_K-multilingual-mtp?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.