Model benchmarks

Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp local LLM performance

As of October 2026, Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp runs at up to 46.4 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

OpenAI-compatiblellama.cpp k8 v4 -1 budget
ShareRedditX

Model size

27B

Peak speed

46.4 tok/s

Average speed

40.5 tok/s

Avg PP

369.9 tok/s

Min memory

15.2 GB

Max context

65,536 tokens

Avg output / run

52,944 tokens

Avg runtime / run

22m 42s

Avg quality

85.8

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall83.285.888.5
Agent Workflow87.588.990.4
Code Generation81.884.286.5
Role Play & Narrative79.585.892.1
Research & Analysis84.084.484.9

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XTllama.cpp k8 v4 -1 budget—46.4 tok/s46.4 tok/s17.3 GB65,536 tokens82.91
AMD Radeon RX 7800 XTOpenAI-compatible—34.6 tok/s34.6 tok/s15.2 GB65,536 tokens88.81

Benchmark runs

All 2 Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp good for coding?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp scores 84.2/100 for coding, currently the best-scoring model for coding that runs on consumer hardware (≤24 GB VRAM). It runs at about 40.5 tok/s, so if you want more speed, K2-Horizon-MoVA-36B-A4B-MLX-4bit is faster (~48.5 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (82.5/100).
Is Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp scores 88.9/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 40.5 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-APEX-Mini is faster (~88.2 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.3/100).
How fast is Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp reaches up to 46.4 tok/s and averages 40.5 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon RX 7800 XT.
How much memory does Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 15.2 GB of memory.
Which tools have been used to run Qwen3.8-27B-Turbo-Brilliance-50X-RI-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_XXS-mtp?
Benchmarks were submitted using OpenAI-compatible, llama.cpp k8 v4 -1 budget. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.