Model benchmarks

qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit local LLM performance

As of November 2026, qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit runs at up to 42.2 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

LM Studio4bit
ShareRedditX

Model size

9B

Peak speed

42.2 tok/s

Average speed

41.7 tok/s

Avg PP

247.1 tok/s

Min memory

7.4 GB

Max context

65,536 tokens

Avg output / run

13,531 tokens

Avg runtime / run

5m 51s

Avg quality

65.9

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall64.365.967.5
Agent Workflow78.483.588.5
Code Generation34.243.252.2
Role Play & Narrative67.074.281.4
Research & Analysis58.162.767.4

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated November 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
Apple M1 MaxLM Studio4bit42.2 tok/s41.7 tok/s7.4 GB65,536 tokens65.92

Benchmark runs

All 2 qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit good for coding?
In our benchmarks, qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit scores 43.2/100 for coding. It runs at about 41.7 tok/s, so if you want more speed, nvidia/Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4 is faster (~63.3 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (82.7/100).
Is qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit scores 83.5/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 41.7 tok/s, so if you want more speed, swift-iq2_xs is faster (~91.5 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.4/100).
How fast is qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit reaches up to 42.2 tok/s and averages 41.7 tok/s, with the fastest results on Apple M1 Max.
How much memory does qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 7.4 GB of memory (quantizations tested: 4bit).
Which tools have been used to run qwen3.8-9b-distill-mlx@4bit?
Benchmarks were submitted using LM Studio. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.