Model benchmarks

local/qwen3.8-flash-next local LLM performance

As of September 2026, local/qwen3.8-flash-next runs at up to 74.7 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

mlx-serve
ShareRedditX

Model size

Unknown

Peak speed

74.7 tok/s

Average speed

74.6 tok/s

Avg PP

2213.3 tok/s

Min memory

n/a

Max context

8.192 tokens

Avg output / run

9.824 tokens

Avg runtime / run

2m 1s

Avg quality

66.3

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall64.166.368.5
Agent Workflow71.175.780.3
Code Generation29.532.735.8
Role Play & Narrative76.078.480.8
Research & Analysis77.178.479.7

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination local/qwen3.8-flash-next has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated September 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
Apple M3 Ultramlx-serve74.7 tok/s74.6 tok/sn/a8.192 tokens66.32

Benchmark runs

All 2 local/qwen3.8-flash-next runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is local/qwen3.8-flash-next good for coding?
In our benchmarks, local/qwen3.8-flash-next scores 32.7/100 for coding. It runs at about 74.6 tok/s, so if you want more speed, ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF is faster (~96.3 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (83.4/100).
Is local/qwen3.8-flash-next good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, local/qwen3.8-flash-next scores 75.7/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 74.6 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-BigBang-oQ8e-mtp is faster (~102.7 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.1/100).
How fast is local/qwen3.8-flash-next for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, local/qwen3.8-flash-next reaches up to 74.7 tok/s and averages 74.6 tok/s, with the fastest results on Apple M3 Ultra.
How much memory does local/qwen3.8-flash-next need?
The leanest observed configuration used about n/a of memory.
Which tools have been used to run local/qwen3.8-flash-next?
Benchmarks were submitted using mlx-serve. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.