Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp good for coding?

In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp scores 74.4/100 for coding. It runs at about 55.4 tok/s, so if you want more speed, ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF is faster (~90.8 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (83.8/100).

Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?

In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp scores 83.3/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 55.4 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).

How fast is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp for local inference?

Across 106 community benchmark runs, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp reaches up to 86.1 tok/s and averages 55.4 tok/s, with the fastest results on Apple M5 Max.

How much memory does Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp need?

The leanest observed configuration used about 84.1 GB of memory (quantizations tested: oQ5e).

Which tools have been used to run Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp?

Benchmarks were submitted using oMLX. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.

Model benchmarks

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp local LLM performance

As of October 2026, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp runs at up to 86.1 tok/s for local inference (best of 106 community benchmark runs across 2 GPUs).

oMLXoQ5e

ShareReddit X

Model size

125B

Peak speed

86.1 tok/s

Average speed

55.4 tok/s

Avg PP

768.3 tok/s

Min memory

84.1 GB

Max context

262,144 tokens

Avg output / run

18,337 tokens

Avg runtime / run

6m 1s

Avg quality

82.9

Benchmark runs

106

GPUs tested

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 106 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

Task	P5 (low)	Avg	P95 (high)
Overall	78.0	82.9	87.3
Agent Workflow	72.6	83.3	91.8
Code Generation	65.8	74.4	83.0
Role Play & Narrative	83.2	89.7	93.7
Research & Analysis	79.6	84.3	88.9

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

Hardware	Tool	Quant	Best tok/s	Avg tok/s	Memory	Context	Quality	Runs
Apple M5 Max	oMLX	oQ5e	86.1 tok/s	70.2 tok/s	84.1 GB	262,144 tokens	83.9	6
Apple M4 Max	oMLX	—	62.4 tok/s	55.2 tok/s	84.5 GB	262,144 tokens	83.3	79
Apple M4 Max	oMLX	oQ5e	53.6 tok/s	51.9 tok/s	86.1 GB	262,144 tokens	81.3	21

Benchmark runs

All 106 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Open run page →

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp good for coding?: In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp scores 74.4/100 for coding. It runs at about 55.4 tok/s, so if you want more speed, ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF is faster (~90.8 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (83.8/100).
Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?: In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp scores 83.3/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 55.4 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
How fast is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp for local inference?: Across 106 community benchmark runs, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp reaches up to 86.1 tok/s and averages 55.4 tok/s, with the fastest results on Apple M5 Max.
How much memory does Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp need?: The leanest observed configuration used about 84.1 GB of memory (quantizations tested: oQ5e).
Which tools have been used to run Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-oQ5e-mtp?: Benchmarks were submitted using oMLX. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.