Model benchmarks

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8 local LLM performance

As of September 2026, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8 runs at up to 52.3 tok/s for local inference (best of 3 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

oMLX
ShareRedditX

Model size

4B

Peak speed

52.3 tok/s

Average speed

51.8 tok/s

Avg prefill

347.5 tok/s

Min memory

88.1 GB

Max context

262,144 tokens

Avg output / run

13,047 tokens

Avg runtime / run

4m 41s

Avg quality

82.9

Benchmark runs

3

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 3 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall77.382.987.4
Agent Workflow73.984.192.1
Code Generation69.176.681.5
Role Play & Narrative81.786.291.8
Research & Analysis84.384.785.2

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8 has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated September 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
Apple M4 MaxoMLX52.3 tok/s51.8 tok/s88.1 GB262,144 tokens82.93

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8 good for coding?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8 scores 76.6/100 for coding. It runs at about 51.8 tok/s, so if you want more speed, unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:IQ3_S is faster (~104.3 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (83.0/100).
Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8 good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8 scores 84.1/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 51.8 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
How fast is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8 for local inference?
Across 3 community benchmark runs, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8 reaches up to 52.3 tok/s and averages 51.8 tok/s, with the fastest results on Apple M4 Max.
How much memory does Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8 need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 88.1 GB of memory.
Which tools have been used to run Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Q5GU-Q6Attn-g64-BF16-PLE-MLX-MTP-Q8?
Benchmarks were submitted using oMLX. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.