Model benchmarks

Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw local LLM performance

As of October 2026, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw runs at up to 78.0 tok/s for local inference (best of 5 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

mlx-servesushi
ShareRedditX

Model size

6B

Peak speed

78.0 tok/s

Average speed

74.3 tok/s

Avg PP

575.3 tok/s

Min memory

46.2 GB

Max context

65,536 tokens

Avg output / run

12,654 tokens

Avg runtime / run

2m 55s

Avg quality

83.6

Benchmark runs

5

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 5 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall80.483.686.4
Agent Workflow76.784.590.6
Code Generation75.878.783.6
Role Play & Narrative83.888.592.6
Research & Analysis78.582.687.4

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
Apple M5 Maxsushi—78.0 tok/s76.1 tok/s46.2 GB65,536 tokens82.82
Apple M5 Maxmlx-serve—74.4 tok/s73.2 tok/s46.9 GB65,536 tokens84.13

Benchmark runs

All 5 Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw good for coding?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw scores 78.7/100 for coding. It runs at about 74.3 tok/s, so if you want more speed, ornith-ai/Ornith-1.5-35B-A3B-GGUF is faster (~90.8 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (83.8/100).
Is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw scores 84.5/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 74.3 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-APEX-Mini is faster (~88.2 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.3/100).
How fast is Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw for local inference?
Across 5 community benchmark runs, Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw reaches up to 78.0 tok/s and averages 74.3 tok/s, with the fastest results on Apple M5 Max.
How much memory does Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 46.2 GB of memory.
Which tools have been used to run Qwen3.8-Flash-Next-Sushi-2.6bpw?
Benchmarks were submitted using mlx-serve, sushi. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.