Model benchmarks

peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q6_K_XL local LLM performance

As of October 2026, peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q6_K_XL runs at up to 157.1 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 2 GPUs).

llama.cppQ6_K
ShareRedditX

Model size

2B

Peak speed

157.1 tok/s

Average speed

109.2 tok/s

Avg PP

1373.6 tok/s

Min memory

5.5 GB

Max context

131,072 tokens

Avg output / run

14,200 tokens

Avg runtime / run

3m 8s

Avg quality

55.5

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

2

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall54.655.556.3
Agent Workflow75.776.877.8
Code Generation15.023.532.1
Role Play & Narrative41.347.754.1
Research & Analysis73.673.974.2

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q6_K_XL has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070llama.cppQ6_K157.1 tok/s157.1 tok/s5.8 GB131,072 tokens54.51
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060llama.cppQ6_K61.3 tok/s61.3 tok/s5.5 GB65,536 tokens56.41

Benchmark runs

All 2 peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q6_K_XL runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q6_K_XL good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q6_K_XL scores 76.8/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 109.2 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MLX-oQ4e-MTP is faster (~144.4 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (82.6/100).
How fast is peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q6_K_XL for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q6_K_XL reaches up to 157.1 tok/s and averages 109.2 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070.
How much memory does peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q6_K_XL need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 5.5 GB of memory (quantizations tested: Q6_K).
Which tools have been used to run peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-MiniCPM5-2B-GGUF:Q6_K_XL?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.