Model benchmarks

peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF local LLM performance

As of October 2026, peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF runs at up to 95.5 tok/s for local inference (best of 3 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

Unsloth StudioQ6_K_XL
ShareRedditX

Model size

4B

Peak speed

95.5 tok/s

Average speed

91.2 tok/s

Avg PP

3773.3 tok/s

Min memory

6.7 GB

Max context

131,072 tokens

Avg output / run

75,730 tokens

Avg runtime / run

15m

Avg quality

69.6

Benchmark runs

3

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 3 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall66.469.671.6
Agent Workflow74.379.687.2
Code Generation56.861.965.9
Role Play & Narrative62.167.171.1
Research & Analysis65.669.872.7

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070Unsloth StudioQ6_K_XL95.5 tok/s91.2 tok/s6.7 GB131,072 tokens69.63

Benchmark runs

All 3 peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF good for coding?
In our benchmarks, peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF scores 61.9/100 for coding. It runs at about 91.2 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Tiel-Coder-35B-A3B-MLX-oQ4e is faster (~107.9 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (81.5/100).
Is peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF scores 79.6/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 91.2 tok/s, so if you want more speed, qwen3.8-flash-next-iq3_s is faster (~116.8 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (88.4/100).
How fast is peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF for local inference?
Across 3 community benchmark runs, peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF reaches up to 95.5 tok/s and averages 91.2 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070.
How much memory does peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 6.7 GB of memory (quantizations tested: Q6_K_XL).
Which tools have been used to run peculiar-ragdoll/Sharp-Spark-X2.5-4B-GGUF?
Benchmarks were submitted using Unsloth Studio. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.