Model benchmarks

smollm2-1.7b-instruct local LLM performance

As of October 2026, smollm2-1.7b-instruct runs at up to 50.3 tok/s for local inference (best of 3 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

LM StudioQ8_0
ShareRedditX

Model size

1.7B

Peak speed

50.3 tok/s

Average speed

49.4 tok/s

Avg PP

1955.8 tok/s

Min memory

3.7 GB

Max context

32,768 tokens

Avg output / run

3,594 tokens

Avg runtime / run

1m 20s

Avg quality

35.8

Benchmark runs

3

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 3 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall32.335.841.3
Agent Workflow35.640.945.0
Code Generation7.519.839.2
Role Play & Narrative45.149.254.0
Research & Analysis29.133.338.3

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination smollm2-1.7b-instruct has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050LM StudioQ8_050.3 tok/s49.4 tok/s3.7 GB32,768 tokens35.83

Benchmark runs

All 3 smollm2-1.7b-instruct runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is smollm2-1.7b-instruct good for coding?
In our benchmarks, smollm2-1.7b-instruct scores 19.8/100 for coding. It runs at about 49.4 tok/s, so if you want more speed, nvidia/Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4 is faster (~63.3 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (82.7/100).
Is smollm2-1.7b-instruct good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, smollm2-1.7b-instruct scores 40.9/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 49.4 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-APEX-Mini is faster (~88.2 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.3/100).
How fast is smollm2-1.7b-instruct for local inference?
Across 3 community benchmark runs, smollm2-1.7b-instruct reaches up to 50.3 tok/s and averages 49.4 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050.
How much memory does smollm2-1.7b-instruct need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 3.7 GB of memory (quantizations tested: Q8_0).
Which tools have been used to run smollm2-1.7b-instruct?
Benchmarks were submitted using LM Studio. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.