Model benchmarks

swift-1.5-9b-q6_k local LLM performance

As of November 2026, swift-1.5-9b-q6_k runs at up to 39.7 tok/s for local inference (best of 3 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cppQ6_K
ShareRedditX

Model size

9B

Peak speed

39.7 tok/s

Average speed

39.7 tok/s

Avg PP

1297.1 tok/s

Min memory

13.9 GB

Max context

200,000 tokens

Avg output / run

33,431 tokens

Avg runtime / run

14m 13s

Avg quality

74.4

Benchmark runs

3

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 3 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall66.274.482.2
Agent Workflow30.364.186.8
Code Generation52.666.476.5
Role Play & Narrative80.582.784.3
Research & Analysis83.884.384.8

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination swift-1.5-9b-q6_k has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated November 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
AMD Radeon RX 9050 / 9060 XTllama.cppQ6_K39.7 tok/s39.7 tok/s13.9 GB200,000 tokens74.43

Benchmark runs

All 3 swift-1.5-9b-q6_k runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is swift-1.5-9b-q6_k good for coding?
In our benchmarks, swift-1.5-9b-q6_k scores 66.4/100 for coding. It runs at about 39.7 tok/s, so if you want more speed, nvidia/Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4 is faster (~63.3 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (82.7/100).
Is swift-1.5-9b-q6_k good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, swift-1.5-9b-q6_k scores 64.1/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 39.7 tok/s, so if you want more speed, swift-iq2_xs is faster (~91.5 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.4/100).
How fast is swift-1.5-9b-q6_k for local inference?
Across 3 community benchmark runs, swift-1.5-9b-q6_k reaches up to 39.7 tok/s and averages 39.7 tok/s, with the fastest results on AMD Radeon RX 9050 / 9060 XT.
How much memory does swift-1.5-9b-q6_k need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 13.9 GB of memory (quantizations tested: Q6_K).
Which tools have been used to run swift-1.5-9b-q6_k?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.