Model benchmarks

Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp local LLM performance

As of September 2026, Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp runs at up to 38.3 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cpp
ShareRedditX

Model size

27B

Peak speed

38.3 tok/s

Average speed

37.9 tok/s

Avg PP

296.8 tok/s

Min memory

13.2 GB

Max context

98.304 tokens

Avg output / run

33.028 tokens

Avg runtime / run

14m 33s

Avg quality

82.4

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall78.382.486.6
Agent Workflow72.178.985.6
Code Generation68.475.682.8
Role Play & Narrative87.289.892.4
Research & Analysis85.385.485.5

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated September 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060llama.cpp—38.3 tok/s37.9 tok/s13.2 GB98.304 tokens82.42

Benchmark runs

All 2 Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp good for coding?
In our benchmarks, Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp scores 75.6/100 for coding. It runs at about 37.9 tok/s, so if you want more speed, unsloth/Qwen3.8-27B-GGUF:IQ3_S is faster (~104.3 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (83.0/100).
Is Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp scores 78.9/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 37.9 tok/s, so if you want more speed, granite-4.2-8b-Q4_K_L is faster (~71.6 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (92.9/100).
How fast is Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp reaches up to 38.3 tok/s and averages 37.9 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5060.
How much memory does Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 13.2 GB of memory.
Which tools have been used to run Swift-1.5-Qwen3.8-27B-GSQ-RCO-IQ3_S-mtp?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.