Model benchmarks

ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 local LLM performance

As of October 2026, ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 runs at up to 65.3 tok/s for local inference (best of 3 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cppQ1_0
ShareRedditX

Model size

27B

Peak speed

65.3 tok/s

Average speed

64.7 tok/s

Avg PP

978.1 tok/s

Min memory

9.7 GB

Max context

131,072 tokens

Avg output / run

39,079 tokens

Avg runtime / run

10m 22s

Avg quality

84.5

Benchmark runs

3

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 3 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall82.484.586.0
Agent Workflow82.286.190.2
Code Generation77.979.781.4
Role Play & Narrative87.989.491.2
Research & Analysis80.282.785.1

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070llama.cppQ1_065.3 tok/s64.7 tok/s9.7 GB131,072 tokens84.53

Benchmark runs

All 3 ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 good for coding?
In our benchmarks, ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 scores 79.7/100 for coding. It runs at about 64.7 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-IQ3_XXS is faster (~91.4 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (81.6/100).
Is ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 scores 86.1/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 64.7 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-APEX-Mini is faster (~88.2 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.3/100).
How fast is ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 for local inference?
Across 3 community benchmark runs, ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 reaches up to 65.3 tok/s and averages 64.7 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070.
How much memory does ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0 need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 9.7 GB of memory (quantizations tested: Q1_0).
Which tools have been used to run ukisai/Swift-Bonsai-2-GGUF:TQ1_0?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.