Model benchmarks

prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 local LLM performance

As of October 2026, prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 runs at up to 58.2 tok/s for local inference (best of 2 community benchmark runs across 1 GPU).

llama.cppQ1_0
ShareRedditX

Model size

27B

Peak speed

58.2 tok/s

Average speed

57.8 tok/s

Avg PP

1237.6 tok/s

Min memory

10.0 GB

Max context

131,072 tokens

Avg output / run

68,346 tokens

Avg runtime / run

21m 24s

Avg quality

82.4

Benchmark runs

2

GPUs tested

1

Quality by task

Average LLM-judged quality (0–100) with the run-to-run spread shown as a P5–P95 band, overall and for each benchmark task, across all 2 runs. The low and high columns show how much the judge’s score varies between runs, and need at least two runs to display.

TaskP5 (low)AvgP95 (high)
Overall81.382.483.5
Agent Workflow90.490.490.4
Code Generation75.376.778.0
Role Play & Narrative79.381.082.7
Research & Analysis80.181.583.0

Performance by hardware and tool

Every hardware/tool/quantization combination prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 has been benchmarked on, ranked by peak token generation speed. Last updated October 2026.

HardwareToolQuantBest tok/sAvg tok/sMemoryContextQualityRuns
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070llama.cppQ1_058.2 tok/s57.8 tok/s10.0 GB131,072 tokens82.42

Benchmark runs

All 2 prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 runs submitted so far — expand one for its hardware, quality breakdown and per-scenario detail.

Frequently asked questions

Is prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 good for coding?
In our benchmarks, prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 scores 76.7/100 for coding. It runs at about 57.8 tok/s, so if you want more speed, nvidia/Qwen3.8-27B-NVFP4 is faster (~75.5 tok/s) and still scores well for coding (83.5/100).
Is prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 good for agentic (tool-using) tasks?
In our benchmarks, prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 scores 90.4/100 for agentic workflows. It runs at about 57.8 tok/s, so if you want more speed, Nex-N2.5-mini-APEX-Mini is faster (~88.2 tok/s) and still scores well for agentic workflows (91.3/100).
How fast is prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 for local inference?
Across 2 community benchmark runs, prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 reaches up to 58.2 tok/s and averages 57.8 tok/s, with the fastest results on NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070.
How much memory does prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0 need?
The leanest observed configuration used about 10.0 GB of memory (quantizations tested: Q1_0).
Which tools have been used to run prism-ml/Ternary-Bonsai-2-27B-gguf:TQ1_0?
Benchmarks were submitted using llama.cpp. Results are community-contributed and updated as new runs arrive.